The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. NCAA, declaring that certain provisions of the PASPA violated the Constitution’s “anti-commandeering” clause, is a potential boon for legal sports betting in the U.S.
Sports betting conferences proliferate these days, makes sense because the category is very much a work in progress and operators are in information gathering mode. In that spirit, here are some excerpts from a session at this spring’s NIGA show.
AGS held its second annual GameON Mexico Customer Summit last month at Piso 51 in Mexico City, with more than 50 casino operators in attendance representing gaming properties across Mexico. The annual event is designed to bring AGS’ customers [...]
I like to think I am somewhat savvy when it comes to technological matters. After all, at a previous stop in my career, I was the editor in chief of a trade publication covering system technology for the banking industry.
When the tribal gaming industry convened at the national Indian Gaming Association’s annual convention in April, sports betting was at the top of the conference agenda.
Major commercial sports content providers have started to embrace the wagering industry in a major way, as evidenced by the recent spate of partnership deals with leading land-based and online sports betting operators.
The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. NCAA, declaring that certain provisions of the PASPA violated the Constitution’s “anti-commandeering” clause, is a potential boon for legal sports betting in the U.S.
